Straka v. Johnson & Johnson et al
| Clifford Straka |
| Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. |
| 0:2008cv05742 |
| October 15, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Tunheim |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
280
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 244 Motion for New Trial; denying plaintiff's 246 Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 28, 2012. (DML)
|
|
Filing
190
ORDER The Court makes the following amendment to its previous 188 Order: Defendants' 89 Motion in Limine on Various Issues is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted re garding reference to other products of Defendants that do not meet the "substantial similarity" test for relevance, and granted regarding the exclusion of marketing materials from other drug companies. The motion is denied in all other respects(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 29, 2011. (DML)
|
|
Filing
185
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying defendants' 44 Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 28, 2011. (DML)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
