Kinetic Co., Inc, The v. Medtronic, Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court Kinetic Co., Inc, The v. Medtronic, Inc

Kinetic Co., Inc, The v. Medtronic, Inc

Plaintiff:	Kinetic Co., Inc, The
Defendant:	Medtronic, Inc
Case Number:	0:2008cv06062
Filed:	November 17, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Boylan
Presiding Judge:	Ericksen
Nature of Suit:	Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 19, 2011	Filing 115 ORDER - Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings 91 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion is GRANTED as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII and IX in plaintiff's amended complaint 57 with respect to all devices at issue except the Model 7285 device, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 04/19/11. (bjs)
December 4, 2009	Filing 32 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Dismiss. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 12/04/2009. (kmc)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 19, 2011

Filing 115 ORDER - Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings 91 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion is GRANTED as to Counts I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII and IX in plaintiff's amended complaint 57 with respect to all devices at issue except the Model 7285 device, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. Defendant's motion is DENIED in all other respects. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 04/19/11. (bjs)

December 4, 2009

Filing 32 ORDER denying 2 Motion to Dismiss. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 12/04/2009. (kmc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kinetic Co., Inc, The v. Medtronic, Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc
Represented By:	Michael T Nilan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kinetic Co., Inc, The
Represented By:	Thomas I Hara
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?