Todd et al v. I-Flow Corporation et al
| Katie Todd and Jason Todd |
| Abbot Laboratories, APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Zeneca Holdings Inc., Hospira, Inc., I-Flow Corporation, DJO Incorporated, DJO, LLC, Breg, Inc., Orthofix International NV, Orthofix Inc, Laryngeal Mask Company Limited, The, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, LMA North America, Inc. and Abraxis Bioscience, Inc. |
| 0:2008cv06178 |
| November 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Frank |
| Keyes |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
ORDER re 160 Stipulation of Dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, AstraZeneca LP, and Zeneca Holdings Inc. are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without costs or disbursements to any party.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on February 14, 2010. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER re 88 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Hospira, Inc., Jason Todd, Katie Todd, Abbot Laboratories. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Hospira, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without costs or disbursements to any party. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 12, 2009. (HAM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
