Crawford v. Kaul et al
Sharn Rodriguez Crawford |
James Kaul, Joan Fabian and Brad Dupre |
0:2008cv06190 |
November 26, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Anoka |
Boylan |
Ericksen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 52 (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on October 14, 2009. (slf) |
Filing 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Defendant Dr. Brad Dupre's motion for summary judgment, (Docket No. 37), be GRANTED; 2. Defendant Dr. James Kaul's and Defendant Commissioner Joan Fabian's motion to dismiss, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12( b)(6), (Docket No. 30), be GRANTED; 3. The action be dismissed, without prejudice, as to Defendant Correctional Medical Services (CMS), for lack of service of process, unless Plaintiff files a timely objection to this Report and Recommendation, which shows good cause to extend the deadline for effecting service of process on Defendant Correctional Medical Services (CMS), in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); 4. Plaintiff's pending "motion to amend," (Docket No. 49), should be c onstrued as a motion to supplement the evidentiary record in this case by including the exhibits submitted with the motion, (Docket No. 50), and as so construed, the motion should be GRANTED; and 5. This case be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 10/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 9/24/09. (VEM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.