Klinkhammer v. Anishinabe Legal Services, Inc. et al
| Michael Klinkhammer |
| Northwest Minnesota Foundation, The and Anishinabe Legal Services, Inc. |
| 0:2008cv06320 |
| December 10, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Beltrami |
| Ericksen |
| Erickson |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.NMFs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 38] is GRANTED.2.Anishinabes Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 51] is GRANTED. 3.Defendants Joint Motion to Strike Affidavit [Docket No. 62] is DENIED.4.Counsel for Klinkh ammer shall not charge or collect any fees from Klinkhammer incurred in the preparation or filing of Silks affidavit or show-cause memorandum.5.This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on April 5, 2010. (slf)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 20 and denying 8 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Michael Klinkhammer (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 10, 2009. (slf)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION That the Plaintiff's Motion for Remand Docket No. 8 be denied. Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2009. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Raymond L. Erickson on 05/13/09. (jz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
