Friederichs et al v. Gorz et al
N. Paul Friederichs and Jill A. Friederichs |
John Doe, Jane Roe, Tom Gorz, Minnesota Metals, Indy Mac and ABC/XYZ Corporation |
0:2008cv06419 |
December 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Anoka |
Keyes |
Kyle |
Truth in Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER that the Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 06/08/09. (rhks) |
Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING 31 Request to file Surreply. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 05/05/09. (rhks) |
Filing 22 ORDER that Plaintiffs shall serve and file a response to IndyMacs Motion on or before April 24, 2009; IndyMac shall serve and file a reply, if any, on or before May 1, 2009; the hearing currently scheduled for May 14, 2009, at 8:00 a.m. is CANCELED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 04/01/09. (rhks) |
Filing 15 ORDER that on or before March 30, 2009, Defendant IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. shall serve and file a response to plaintiffs' submission. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/19/09. (rhks) |
Filing 11 ORDER that Plaintiffs show cause in writing, on or before March 18, 2009, why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject-mater jurisdiction. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/03/09. (rhks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.