United States of America v. Wagner Spray Tech Corporation
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Techtronic Industries Company, Ltd. and Wagner Spray Tech Corporation
Case Number: 0:2008cv06478
Filed: December 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J Keyes
Referring Judge: Ann D Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2009. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STIPULATION JUDGMENT AND AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 7/23/2009. (GS)
July 23, 2009 Filing 23 **TEXT ONLY ENTRY** NOTICE of CANCELLATION OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE: Settlement Conference scheduled for 7/28/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6A (STP) before Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes has been CANCELLED. (JEP)
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER: Based on the agreement of the parties, and the pending settlement of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The defendants may have an indefinite extension of time to file answers, or other responsive pleadings, to plaintiffs amended complaint. If the parties do not reach a settlement agreement, defendants shall file their answers, or other responsive pleadings, within five business days of plaintiffs request that defendants file their responsive pleadings. The parties will inform the court on or before July 28, 2009, of the status of this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 07/13/2009. (MMP)
June 24, 2009 Filing 21 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Civil Penalties against Wagner Spray Tech Corporation, filed by United States of America. (Englehart, Mary)
June 24, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO JOIN AN ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT: that Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. On or before June 29, 2009, Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint for Civil Penalties (Doc. No. #15 , Attach. 1), as the Amended Complaint in this matter; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant will have 20 days from the date of this Order to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 06/24/2009. (MMP)
June 24, 2009 Filing 19 LETTER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Wagner Spray Tech Corporation. (Soule, George)
June 23, 2009 Filing 18 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by United States of America re #16 Notice of Hearing on Motion, #17 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #15 MOTION for Joinder of an Additional Defendant (Englehart, Mary)
June 23, 2009 Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 MOTION for Joinder of an Additional Defendant filed by United States of America. (Englehart, Mary)
June 23, 2009 Filing 16 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re #15 MOTION for Joinder (Englehart, Mary) Modified link & text on 6/24/2009 (lph).
June 23, 2009 Filing 15 MOTION for Joinder of an Additional Defendant by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Amended Complaint for Civil Penalties)(Englehart, Mary)
June 10, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, ( Settlement Conference set for 7/28/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6A Warren E. Burger Federal Courthouse, 316 North Robert Street, St. Paul, Minnesota before Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 06/10/2009. (MMP)
April 14, 2009 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ENTRY - ORDER granting #13 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of attorney Lee H. Simowitz for Wagner Spray Tech Corporation. Fee paid; receipt number 4-033719. Approved by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 4/14/09. (MMC)
April 10, 2009 Filing 13 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Lee H. Simowitz by Wagner Spray Tech Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Soule, George)
April 7, 2009 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ENTRY - ORDER granting #12 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Mary M Englehart for United States of America. Fee waived for U.S. government attorney.Approved by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 4/7/09. (MMC)
April 7, 2009 Filing 12 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Mary M. Englehart by United States of America. (Ebert, Matthew)
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 6/30/2009. Discovery due by 11/15/2009. Motions (non-disp) due 11/1/2009. Motions (disp) due by 3/1/2010. Ready for trial due by 5/1/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 03/20/2009. (MMP)
March 18, 2009 Filing 10 Minute Entry: Pretrial scheduling conference proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 3/18/2009. Pretrial Scheduling Order to be issued. (MMP)
March 13, 2009 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by United States of America.(Ebert, Matthew)
February 12, 2009 Filing 8 AMENDED NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 3/18/2009 03:30 PM in In Chambers Hearing 646 before Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. (RLR)
February 2, 2009 Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Pretrial Conference set for 2/19/2009 10:30 AM in Chambers-646, Warren E. Burger Federal Building, 316 North Robert Street, St. Paul, Minnesota before Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(MMP)
January 28, 2009 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Wagner Spray Tech Corporation re #4 Answer to Complaint, #5 Rule 7.1 - Disclosure Statement (Soule, George)
January 28, 2009 Filing 5 RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Wagner Spray Tech Corporation of Wagner Holding, Inc. as corporate parent and/or publicly held company. (Soule, George)
January 28, 2009 Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by Wagner Spray Tech Corporation. (Soule, George)
January 14, 2009 Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Wagner Spray Tech Corporation served on 1/9/2009, answer due 1/29/2009. (Ebert, Matthew)
January 13, 2009 Filing 2 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - WRONG DOCKET EVENT USED // Return of Service Executed for Summons and Complaint served on Tom Craig on 01/09/2009, filed by United States of America. (Ebert, Matthew) Modified on 1/14/2009 (LPH).
December 23, 2008 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wagner Spray Tech Corporation assigned to Judge Ann D Montgomery per Master List and referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J Keyes, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (kt)
December 23, 2008 Summons Issued as to Wagner Spray Tech Corporation. (kt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Wagner Spray Tech Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Techtronic Industries Company, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wagner Spray Tech Corporation
Represented By: George W Soule
Represented By: Lee H Simowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Mary M. Englehart
Represented By: Matthew S Ebert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?