Rachuy v. Rubin et al
| Gale A. Rachuy |
| Mark S Rubin, St. Louis, County of, Laura S Rosenthal, Ramsey, County of, Jessica Schulte Williams, Alan I Silver and Bassford Remele |
| 0:2008mc00068 |
| December 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Franklin L. Noel |
| James M. Rosenbaum |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING 11 Report and Recommendation. The Court's Order dated February 27, 2009 6 is vacated and this matter is remanded to Magistrate Judge Noel to address the merits of the Plaintiff's petition. Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 4/15/2009. (HLW)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER vacating 9 ORDER; REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to vacate 6 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations. Objections to R&R due by 4/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 3/20/09. (kt)
|
|
Filing
6
VACATED PER 13 ORDER: ORDER ADOPTING 5 Report and Recommendation; denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; This action is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Rosenbaum on 2/27/2009. (HLW) Modified text on 4/16/2009 (kt).
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Gale A. Rachuy be denied and this action be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 2/20/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 2/2/09. (kt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
