Savig et al v. First National Bank of Omaha et al
| Robert Savig and Mona Savig |
| Messerli & Kramer, P.A. and First National Bank of Omaha |
| 0:2009cv00132 |
| January 21, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Becker |
| Ericksen |
| Erickson |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
AMENDED ORDER re 39 Second MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by First National Bank of Omaha, Messerli & Kramer, P.A. IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.First National and Messerlis motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 39] is GRANTED.2.This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 11, 2011. (slf)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.First National and Messerlis motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 39] is GRANTED.2.This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 24, 2011. (slf)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings, summary judgment, to certify questions of law to the Minnesota Supreme Court, or a stay of pro ceedings pending resolution of the certified questions [Docket No. 5] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.2.The following question is certified to the Minnesota Supreme Court:May a judgment creditor serve a garnishment summons on a joint account to satisfy the debt of an account holder when not all of the account holders are judgment debtors, and if so, (1) is it the judgment creditor or the account holders who bear the burden of establishing net contributions to the account during the garnish ment proceeding and (2) what applicable presumptions regarding ownership, if any, apply in the absence of proof of net contributions?The Court acknowledges that the Minnesota Supreme Court may reformulate this question. 3.The names and addresses of the parties counsel appear in Appendix A. 4.The Clerk of Court shall forward a copy of this Order to the Minnesota Supreme Court.5.This case is STAYED pending resolution of the certified question.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 6, 2009. (slf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
