Miller v. Carleton et al
| Tyrone Dwayne Miller |
| Philip Carleton and Robert Zapata |
| 0:2009cv00696 |
| March 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Keyes |
| Tunheim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:1. All of Plaintiff's requests for reconsideration, and relief from judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), (Docket Nos. 16, 18, 25 and 29), are DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's request for an extension of the deadline f or filing a notice of appeal in this case, (Docket Nos. 23 and 24), is DENIED; 3. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, (Docket No. 20), is GRANTED; 4. Plaintiff's other collateral requests and motions, ( Docket Nos. 14, 15, 28, 30 and 31), are DENIED; and 5. The Clerk of Court shall not file, or respond to, anything pertaining to this case that is received from Tyrone Dwayne Miller, except as expressly directed by the Court.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 18, 2009. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying plaintiff's 3 Motion for TRO; denying plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's complaint (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 15, 2009. (dml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
