McEwen et al v. Garza et al
| Gregory N McEwen and Linda I McEwen |
| Turner, Stone & Company, LLP, Joe B Garza, Garza and Staples, P.C. and John B Stone |
| Joe B Garza and Garza and Staples, P.C. |
| Turner, Stone & Company, LLP and John B Stone |
| 0:2009cv00868 |
| April 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Ramsey |
| Boylan |
| Tunheim |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER re 22 Stipulation filed by Joe B Garza, Turner, Stone & Company, LLP, John B Stone, Garza and Staples, P.C. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for defendants Joe B. Garza and Garza and Staples, P.C. to respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, filed June 10, 2009, is hereby extended to August 5, 2009. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 6, 2009. (HAM)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER re 20 Stipulation, filed by Joe B Garza, Linda I McEwen, Turner, Stone & Company, LLP, Gregory N McEwen, John B Stone, Garza and Staples, P.C. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for plaintiffs Gregory N. McEwen and Linda I. McEwen to respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss, filed June 10, 2009, is hereby extended to August 5, 2009.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 30, 2009. (HAM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
