Curry v. Fischer
Petitioner: Bobby Ray Curry, Jr.
Respondent: Scott P. Fischer
Case Number: 0:2009cv02104
Filed: August 7, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Pine
Presiding Judge: Keyes
Presiding Judge: Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 by a Person in Federal Custody [Docket No. 1], is DENIED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 18, 2010. (HAM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Curry v. Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott P. Fischer
Represented By: Michael A Dees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bobby Ray Curry, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?