Little v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections
Plaintiff: Jay Richard Little
Defendant: Arrowhead Regional Corrections
Case Number: 0:2009cv02186
Filed: August 20, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Carlton
Presiding Judge: Kyle
Presiding Judge: Erickson
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that all proceedings before Judge Kyle (motions, trial, etc.) will be held in the United States Courthouse in Duluth, Minnesota. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 08/21/09. (kll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Little v. Arrowhead Regional Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay Richard Little
Represented By: Paul Lelii
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arrowhead Regional Corrections
Represented By: Dale O Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?