American Steamship Company v. Hallett Dock Company et al
| American Steamship Company |
| Fraser Shipyards, Inc. and Hallett Dock Company |
| Hallett Dock Company and Fraser Shipyards, Inc. |
| American Steamship Company, Hallett Dock Company and Fraser Shipyards, Inc. |
| 0:2009cv02628 |
| September 25, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Davis |
| Erickson |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
501
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion for Prejudgment Interest Against Hallett Dock Company 474 is GRANTED and Plaintiffs are awarded $2,398,888.54 in prejudgment interest. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/26/13. (GRR) cc: Jonathan Lebedoff. Modified on 6/26/2013 (lmb).
|
|
Filing
496
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant Hallett Dock Company's Motion for a New Trial or, in the Alternative, to Amend the Judgment 476 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/31/13. (GRR) cc: Jonathan Lebedoff Modified on 6/3/2013 (jam). Modified on 6/3/2013 (jam).
|
|
Filing
440
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to ASC's Insurance Policies, Subrogated Insurance Carriers, and Insurance Claims, Adjustment, Deductibles, and Payme nts 328 is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Contrary to Mike Podgorak's Undisputed Employment 330 is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Testimony of Hallett Dock Comp any's Expert Witness Captain John Olthuis 333 is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Testimony of Fraser Shipyards, Inc.'s Expert Witness Captain Robert Libby 336 is GRANTED. 5. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence, Related to Fraser Shipyard's Untimely Salvage "Counterclaim" and "Defense" 340 is GRANTED. 6. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude the January 31, 2008 Memorandum Prep ared by Hallett Dock Company CEO Jeremy Fryberger 343 is GRANTED. 7. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of the United States Coast Guard Report 347 is GRANTED. 8. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidenc e Related to Certain of Fraser Shipyards, Inc.'s and Hallett Dock Company's Affirmative Defenses 350 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: the motion is granted as to Fraser's Fourth, Seventh, Eighth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Thirteenth affirmative defenses and denied as to Fraser's Ninth affirmative defense (failure to mitigate) and Hallett's failure to mitigate defense. 9. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Certain Testimony of Hal lett Dock Company's Expert Joseph Kenyon 353 is DENIED. 10. Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine to Exclude Certain Testimony of Fraser Shipyards, Inc.'s Expert John R. Dudley 375 is GRANTED. 11. Plaintiffs Motion in Limine to Exclude Hallett Dock Company's Witness, Jim Sharrow, From Testifying at Trial 414 is DENIED. 12. Fraser Shipyards' Motion in Limine 364 is DENIED. 13. Hallett Dock's Motion in Limine 389 is DENIED as follows: a. Part 1: To Preclude ASC Expert Arthur Faherty from Testifying as an Expert is DENIED; b. Part 2: To Strike ASC's Claim for Loss of Profits is DENIED; c. Part 3: To Preclude John Adler and Shawn Mulley from Testifying as Witne sses for ASC is DENIED; and d. Part 4: To Preclude Neil Kent from Testifying about the McCarthy's Approach into Hallett Dock No. 8 and the Presence of Fraser Shipyard Personnel on the Dock is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/25/13. (GRR)
|
|
Filing
315
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Motions to Supplement the Record 266 , 276 , 311 are GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike 286 is DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against All Defendants on Damages Related to Repair Costs and Expenses 164 is DENIED; 3. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Defendant Hallett Dock Company 160 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. The Pennsylvania Rule applies to Hallett Dock Company's actions; b. Summary judgment is DENIED in all other respects; 4. Defendant Hallett Dock Company's Motion for Partial Summary 168 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PA RT as follows: a. Count IV (breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose) is DISMISSED; b. All other counts REMAIN; 5. Defendant Fraser Shipyards, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 173 is GRANTED IN PART an d DENIED IN PART as follows; a. Count IV (breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose) and Count V (breach of express warranty) are DISMISSED; b. All other counts REMAIN; 6. Defendant Chris Jensen & Son, Inc.� 39;s a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 156 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows; a. Count IV (breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose) and Count V (breach of express warranty) are DISMISSED; b. Al l other counts REMAIN; 7. Defendants RJS Construction LLC and Reuben Johnson & Son, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 151 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. Count IV (breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose) and Count V (breach of express warranty) are DISMISSED; b. All other counts and cross claims REMAIN. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/23/12. (GRR)
|
|
Filing
210
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Magistrate Judge Brisbois' June 8, 2011 Order 183 which clarified his May 25 Order is AFFIRMED. 2. Defendant Hallett Dock Company's Motion to Vacate or Modify United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois' Order dated June 8, 2011 is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/22/11. (GRR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
