Michaelson v. Anoka County Sheriff Department et al
| Barry Scott Michaelson |
| Bruce Andersohn, Anoka County Sheriff Department and Anoka County Jail Programs |
| 0:2009cv02720 |
| October 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Anoka |
| Davis |
| Noel |
| Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
***DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR, WILL BE REFILED*** WRONG CASE*** ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 3 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's application to leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED, this action is DISMISSED and P laintiff is required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely the full $350, and dismissal of this action is counted as a "strike" against Plaintiff. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/13/09. (KMW) Modified text on 11/16/2009 (RLR).
|
|
Filing
3
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to deny 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Barry Scott Michaelson; that this action be dismissed; that Plaintiff be required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee; and that the dismissal of this action be counted as a strike against Plaintiff. Objections to R&R due by 10/28/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel on 10/14/09. (kt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
