Cascades Development of Minnesota, LLC et al v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company et al
Westport Insurance Corporation, Cascades Development of Minnesota, LLC, Associated Insurance Agents, Inc. and Nicholas Newton |
West Bend Insurance Company, National Specialty Insurance and Jade Janina Benson |
West Bend Insurance Company |
Associated Insurance Agents, Inc. and Nicholas Newton |
0:2009cv02812 |
October 8, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Dakota |
Kyle |
Nelson |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER REMANDING this action to the District Court, Dakota County, Minnesota. The Clerk of this Court shall mail a certified copy of this Order of Remand to the Clerk of the District Court of Dakota County, Minnesota. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 04/25/12. (kll) |
Filing 52 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment; discharging 41 Order to Show Cause; dismissing with prejudice 1 Plaintiffs' Complaint; dismissing with prejudice as moot 2 West Bend's Counterlcaims against Nicholas Newton and Associated. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 01/25/11. (kll) |
Filing 37 ORDER CANCELING the hearing on 31 Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude, currently schedule for November 23, 2010. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 11/9/10. (kll) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.