International Brotherhood of Teamsters Graphic Communications Conference, Upper Midwest Local 1-M v. Walter G. Anderson and Associates, Inc. et al
| International Brotherhood of Teamsters Graphic Communications Conference, Upper Midwest Local 1-M |
| WALTER G. ANDERSON, INC., Walter G. Anderson Printers-Lithographers, Walter G. Anderson, Inc. and Walter G. Anderson and Associates, Inc. |
| WALTER G. ANDERSON, INC., Walter G. Anderson and Associates, Inc. and Walter G. Anderson Printers-Lithographers |
| Walter G. Anderson and Associates, Inc., Walter G. Anderson Printers-Lithographers and WALTER G. ANDERSON, INC. |
| International Brotherhood of Teamsters Graphic Communications Conference, Upper Midwest Local 1-M |
| Michael Ollig |
| 0:2009cv02868 |
| October 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Ramsey |
| Mayeron |
| Schiltz |
| Other |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER - The motion of plaintiff International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Graphic Communications Conference, Upper Midwest Local 1-M and third-party defendant Michael Ollig to dismiss the counterclaim brought by defendants Walter G. Anderson and Associ ates, Inc.; Walter G. Anderson, Inc.; WALTER G. ANDERSON, INC.; and Walter G. Anderson Printers-Lithographers; and the third-party complaint brought by third-party plaintiff Walter G. Anderson, Inc., 5 is GRANTED. The counterclaim and third-party complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS. The motion of plaintiff International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Graphic Communications Conference, Upper Midwest Local 1-M and third-party defendant Michael Ollig for summary judgment 5 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: The motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks an order from the Court compelling defendants to arbitrate the question of whether the Union is bound by the last-chance agreement; and the motion is DENIED in all other respects. The parties are ORDERED to arbitrate the question of whether the Union is bound by the last-chance agreement executed on November 11, 2008. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 09/20/10. (bjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
