Honeywell International Inc. v. Furuno Electric Co. Ltd. et al
| Honeywell International Inc. |
| Furuno Electric Co. Ltd., Furuno U.S.A., Inc., Navico Holdings A.S., Navico, Inc., Raymarine PLC and Raymarine, Inc. |
| 0:2009cv03601 |
| December 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Noel |
| Davis |
| Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
224
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 184 Motion to Compel (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 5/29/13. (kt)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay 121 is GRANTED. The stay is lifted. 2. The parties are ordered to contact the Chambers of Magistrate Judge Leung to schedule a renewed Pretrial Conference for th is case. 3. The parties shall file an amended Rule 26(f) Report and proposed schedule as outlined in Local Rule Form 4 and Local Rule 16.2 at least seven days before the renewed Pretrial Conference, unless otherwise ordered by Magistrate Judge Leung. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 8/6/12. (GRR)
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant Furuno U.S.A., Inc.'s Motion to Stay the Litigation Pending Reexamination of the Asserted Patents 86 is GRANTED . 2. This action is STAYED until the conclusion of the reexamination by the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO") of all Asserted Patents with respect to which the USPTO grants Furuno U.S.A.'s Petitions for Reexamination. 3. The parties shall advise the Court upon issuance of any material decision by the USPTO.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/30/10. (GRR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
