Cook v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Plaintiff: Trevor Cook
Defendant: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Case Number: 0:2009mc00080
Filed: September 11, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Aitkin
Presiding Judge: Magnuson
Presiding Judge: Keyes
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Trevor Cook's Motion to Stay the SEC Investigation 1 is DENIED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/22/09. (GRR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cook v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Represented By: John E Birkenheier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trevor Cook
Represented By: John D Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?