Butler v. Terrell et al
James A. Butler |
Duke Terrell, Bureau of Prison, Mail Room, Clerk of Court, 4th Circuit and U.S. Postal Master |
0:2010cv00016 |
January 4, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Olmsted |
Graham |
Magnuson |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 1) Pltf's Motion to Alter Judgment (Doc.#8) is denied; 2 The Report and Recommendation (Doc.#5) is Adopted; 3) Pltf's Application to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc.#2) is Denied; 4) This action is summarily DI SMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b); and Pltf is required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely the full $350, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on March 17, 2010. (smr) |
Filing 5 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 1. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket No. 2), be DENIED; 2. This action be summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b); 3. Plaintiff be required to pay the unpaid balance of t he Court filing fee, namely the full $350, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2); and 4. The dismissal of this action be counted as a Astrike@ against Plaintiff for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Objections to R&R due by 2/17/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham on 2/2/10. (VEM) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Disqualification and for Reassignment. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 01/05/10. (kll) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.