Branson v. Minnesota, State of
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Branson
Defendant: Minnesota, State of
Case Number: 0:2010cv01795
Filed: April 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Carlton
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion) The Complaint 1 is dismissed without prejudice, for failur to comply with the Court's Order of 4/30/10 and for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff's IFP Application 2 is denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/30/10. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Branson v. Minnesota, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Lee Branson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Minnesota, State of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?