Pierson v. Minneapolis Police Department et al
| Elliot Lamar-Seccer Pierson |
| Minneapolis Police Department, Metro Transit Police Department, City of Minneapolis and Officer Greenwaldt |
| 0:2010cv01960 |
| May 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Defendants Metro Transit Police Department and Officer Greenwaldts Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc No. 30] is GRANTED in part and DENIED inpart as follows:a.Defendants Motion for Summa ry Judgment is DENIED as to Counts I and II of the Complaint;b.Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Count III of the Complaint;c.All claims against Officer Greenwaldt in his official capacity are DISMISSED;2.Defendants City of Minn eapolis and Minneapolis Police Departments Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 13] is GRANTED;3.Counts III, IV, V, and VI of the Complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;4.Defendants Metro Transit Police Department, Minneapolis Police Department, andthe City of Minneapolis are DISMISSED as parties from the suit.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 14, 2012. (slf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
