Maddox et al v. Chisago County Sheriff Office et al
| Harry Maddox, III and Kevin Herman Larson |
| Chisago County Sheriff Office, Gena Grening, Paul Stenger, Debra LaValla, Lisa Foote and Julie Anderson |
| 0:2010cv02133 |
| May 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Chisago |
| Patrick J. Schiltz |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER - Plaintiff Harry Maddox's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 18 is GRANTED. Maddox is ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of at least $5.00. The remaining balance of the filing fee must be paid over time in accordance with 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(2) and a copy of this order shall be sent to Maddox and to prison officials at the institution where Maddox is currently confined. (WRITTEN OPINION). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 08/05/10. (bjs)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER - Plaintiff Harry Maddox's objection 7 is OVERRULED. No later than July 16, 2010, Maddox must pay an initial partial filing fee of not less than $11.20, and plaintiff Kevin Larson must pay an initial partial filing fee of not less than $2.18. If either plaintiff fails to pay his initial partial filing fee in full in accordance with 2 of this Order, his claims will be summarily dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 06/25/10. (bjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
