Schmidt-Gossen v. Astrue et al
Plaintiff: Christine Schmidt-Gossen
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 0:2010cv02406
Filed: June 17, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Isanti
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Adopting 19 Report and Recommendation; Granting in Part and Denying in Part 6 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Christine Schmidt-Gossen; Denying 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Michael J Astrue (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 7/22/2011. (PJM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schmidt-Gossen v. Astrue et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Schmidt-Gossen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?