Maddox v. Carpenter et al
Harry Maddox, III |
Lindsey Carpenter, Dustin Swenson, Dan Peters, Gunnar Erickson, Herbert L. Cantrill, Jessie A. Johnson and Stillwater Prison, Health Services Eye Dept. |
0:2010cv02847 |
July 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Chisago |
Arthur J. Boylan |
Ann D. Montgomery |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 5 Application on Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 9 Motion for Injunctive Relief; Adopting 12 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Objections 13 are OVERRULED; and Plaintiff's Complaint 1 is DISMISSED without prejudice (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 11/10/2010. (TLU) |
Filing 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 9 MOTION INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; SUPPLEMENT COMPLAINT filed by Harry Maddox, III, 5 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Harry Maddox, III, 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Harry Madd ox, III. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that: 1. Plaintiffs Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees, (Docket Nos. 2 and 5), be DENIED; 2. Plaintiffs motion for injunctive relief, (Docket No. 9), be DENIED; and 3. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 10/22/2010. Signed by Chief Mag. Judge Arthur J. Boylan on 10/07/2010. (LMB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.