Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT v. Soo Line Railroad Company

Plaintiff: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad Company
Case Number: 0:2010cv03019
Filed: July 15, 2010
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Referring Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Labor: Railway Labor Act
Cause of Action: 45:151
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 6, 2011 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 10 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 14 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 7/6/2011. (PJM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT v. Soo Line Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT
Represented By: Charles A Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?