Senty-Haugen v. Ludeman
Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen |
Cal Ludeman |
0:2010cv03073 |
July 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Carlton |
Ann D. Montgomery |
Franklin L. Noel |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation; Petitioners Objections 12 are OVERRULED. Petitioners Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED and the Petition 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 06/08/2011. (TLU) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Senty-Haugen v. Ludeman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Arthur Dale Senty-Haugen | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Cal Ludeman | |
Represented By: | Matthew Frank |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.