Sather v. Dooly
Petitioner: Joshua Alan Sather
Respondent: Becky Dooly
Case Number: 0:2010cv03080
Filed: July 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Carlton
Presiding Judge: Jeanne J. Graham
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation, denying plaintiff's 15 Motion for Summary Judgment/Extraordinary Relief filed by Joshua Alan Sather, denying plaintiff's 7 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Joshua Alan Sather. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 26, 2012. (DML) cc: Joshua Alan Sather. Modified on 3/26/2012 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sather v. Dooly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joshua Alan Sather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Becky Dooly
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?