Trombley v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
| Christine Trombley |
| SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. and Government National Mortgage Association |
| 0:2010cv03089 |
| July 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Jeffrey J. Keyes |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Truth in Lending |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendant's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment. Motion is granted with respect to Count I (Avoidance of Contract/Fraud), Count II (Failure to Verify Reasonable Ability to Pay), Count III (Charging Fees for Services Not Provided), Count VI (RESPA Violations), and Count VII (Failure to Comply with Foreclosure Prerequisites). Counts I, II, III, VI, and VII are dismissed. Motion is denied with respect to Count IV (Failure to Clearly and Conspicuously Disclose Material Loan Terms) and Count V (Failure to Honor Plaintiffs Timely Recession). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 24, 2012. (DML)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER re 15 Notice (Other) filed by Government National Mortgage Association. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant Government National Mortgage Association is dismissed from this action with prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 8, 2010. (HAM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
