Moore et al v. ACS Acclaim Construction Services, Inc. et al
James E. Moore and Tim McGough |
ACS Acclaim Construction Services, Inc. and Laura C Wallick |
0:2010cv03566 |
August 16, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
Arthur J. Boylan |
Paul A. Magnuson |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Defendant ACS Acclaim Construction Services, Inc., or Mr. Thomas M. Wallick, as Defendant's representative, are hereby ordered to appear before this Court on June 16, 2011 @ 9:15 a.m. The Defendant ACS Acclaim Construction Services, Inc. shall show cause as to why Defendant's representative, Thomas M. Wallick, should not be committed to confinement until compliance with the Court's February 10, 2011 Order. Failure to appear or respond will result in the issuance of a Bench Warrant. Signed by Judge Paul A. Magnuson on May 11, 2011. (smr) |
Filing 26 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Deft ACS Construction Services, Inc. or Mr. Thomas M. Wallick as Defts representative, are hereby ordered to appear before this Court on May 11, 2011 @ 9:45 am to show cause why a contempt of court order should not be entered adjudging the business through its owner and representative in civil contempt of this Court's February 10, 2011 Order.(Written Opinion) Signed by Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson on April 28, 2011. (smr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.