Evans v. King et al
| Harry Jerome Evans |
| John King and Joan Fabian |
| 0:2010cv04045 |
| September 24, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Washington |
| David S. Doty |
| Susan R. Nelson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 44 Motion for Relief from Judgment; denying as moot 45 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/20/2015. (SMD) cc: Harry Jerome Evans. Modified on 10/20/2014 (lmb).
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. Evans' Motion for Leave to Amend his Petition (Doc. No. 25) and request for an evidentiary hearing are DENIED. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Evans will NOT be granted a Certificate of Appealability (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 9/19/12. (LPH)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT: 1.Magistrate Judge Rau's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 15) is ADOPTED; 2. The Motion for Order for Stay and Abeyance (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED; 3. Grounds Five, Six, Seven, and Ten of the pe tition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) are DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4. Within 30 days of the date of this Order, Respondents are directed to respond to the merits of Grounds One through Four, Eight, Nine, and Eleven of the pet ition, showing cause why Petitioner should not be granted a writ of habeas corpus as to those claims. Petitioner shall file any response within 30 days of the date of Respondents' brief.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 8/29/11. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
