Cold Spring Granite Company v. Matthews International Corporation

Plaintiff: Cold Spring Granite Company
Defendant: Matthews International Corporation
Case Number: 0:2010cv04272
Filed: October 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Stearns
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2011 Filing 36 ORDER denying defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Magistrate Judge's 26 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 29, 2011. (DML)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cold Spring Granite Company v. Matthews International Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cold Spring Granite Company
Represented By: Jon R Trembath
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthews International Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?