Stroeder v. Fabian et al
| Nicholas Stroeder |
| Joan Fabian, Bruce Rieser, Sandra O'Hara, Katie Mack, Mike Kunzie and Mary Martin |
| 0:2010cv04415 |
| October 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Chisago |
| Jeffrey J. Keyes |
| Paul A. Magnuson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
Order Adopting the Report and Recommendation 5 ; Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 2 ; and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 4 . This action is Dismissed with Prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge Paul A. Magnuson on 12/30/2010. (LM)
|
|
Filing
5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, (Docket No. 2 ), be DENIED; 2. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel, (Docket No. 4 ), be DENIED; 3. This action be SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); 4. Plaintiff be required to pay the unpaid balance of the Court filing fee, namely the full $350.00, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(b)(2); and 5. The dismissal of this action be counted as a "strike" against Plaintiff for purposes of 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g). Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2010 Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes on 12/07/2010. (MMP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
