Knowles v. Thielen
Petitioner: Bruce Allen Knowles
Respondent: Mark Thielen
Case Number: 0:2011cv00148
Filed: January 20, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Rice
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Adopting 6 Report and Recommendation; Overruling Objections [7-Reply]; Denying 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus; dismissing this action with prejudice and NOT granting a Certificate of Appealability to Petitioner. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/15/11. (kll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Knowles v. Thielen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mark Thielen
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Kimberly R Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bruce Allen Knowles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?