Afremov v. Jarayan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 13, 2014
ORDER re 174 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Rau's November 26, 2013 Report and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause [Doc. No. 175] are OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part; 2. The Court ADOPTS in part, and DECLINES to adopt in part, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 174]; 3. Plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Artur Jarayan Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court for Violating the Court's July 26, 2012 Receivership Order [Doc. No. 150] is GRANTED in part and DENIED without prejudice in part, as detailed herein; and 4. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Jarayan via email by the end of the day on January 17, 2014 (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/13/14. (LPH)
|October 24, 2012
ORDER : 1. Third-Party Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 121] is GRANTED; 2. The Amended Third-Party Complaint is dismissed in its entirety on the merits and with prejudice; and 3. Third-Party Defendant's Motion for Defau lt Judgment and for Attorney's Fees as to Third-Party Plaintiffs [Doc. No. 137] is DENIED AS MOOT in part as to default judgment, and DENIED in part as to the request for attorney's fees (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/24/12. (LPH)
|March 28, 2012
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: 1. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims and Third-Party Complaint [Doc. No. 33] is GRANTED IN PART (insofar as it seeks dismissal of a part of Count One, the part of Count Two Plaintiff c hallenges, and Counts Five, and Seven), DENIED IN PART (insofar as it seeks to dismiss the other part of Count One, as well as Counts Eight and Nine, to clarify the pleadings, and to strike certain allegations) and DENIED AS MOOT IN PART (insofar a s it seeks to dismiss the original Third-Party Complaint); and 2. Third-Party Defendant John Atzbach's motion to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint [Doc. No. 36] is DENIED (without prejudice to its renewal if Third-Party Plaintiffs are unable to substantiate their claim for contribution or indemnity). (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 3/28/12. (LPH)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?