Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Professional Aircraft Line Service
Northwest Airlines, Inc. |
Professional Aircraft Line Service |
Westchester Fire Insurance Company |
0:2011cv00368 |
February 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Ramsey |
Arthur J. Boylan |
John R. Tunheim |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 86 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part creditor Northwest Airlines, Inc.'s 70 Motion to Alter/Amend/Correct Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 4, 2013. (DML) |
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Creditor Northwest Airlines' 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying Garnishee Westchester Fire Insurance Company's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 25, 2013. (DML) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that Northwest Airlines' 7 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings to Initiate Ancillary Granshiment Proceedings: (1) To initiate ancillary garnishment proceedings is granted ;(2)To join garnishee Westchester Fire Insurance Company as a party is granted;(3)For leave to file a supplemental complaint against Westchester Fire Insurance Company is granted;(4)To vacate Westchester Fire Insurance Company's discharge of its retention obligation to Northwest is granted. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 18, 2011. (DML) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.