Ellis, et al. v. City of Minneapolis, et al.
| Michael W. Blodgett, United States of America, ex rel., Andrew Ellis and Harriet Ellis |
| City of St. Paul, Metropolitan Council, John Does, City of Minneapolis and Jane Does |
| 0:2011cv00416 |
| February 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Tony N. Leung |
| Patrick J. Schiltz |
| Other Fraud |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
218
ORDER - Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the July 24, 2014 R&R 216 is ADOPTED IN PART and the objection of relators Andrew and Harriet Ellis 217 is OVERRULED. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THA T: The motion to dismiss of defendant City of St. Paul 174 is GRANTED. The motion to dismiss of defendant City of Minneapolis 182 is GRANTED. The Ellises' second amended complaint 173 is DISMISSED IN PART WITH PREJUDICE and DISMISSED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION, as explained more fully in the body of this order. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 08/12/14. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER denying 190 Motion to Alter/Amend/Correct Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 10/24/13. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
172
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Relator Michael W. Blodgett's objection 163 is OVERRULED. 2. The July 12, 2013 order 157 is AFFIRMED. 3. Blodgett is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE from this case. 4. This action will be dismissed unless relators Andrew and Harriet Ellis file an amended complaint no later than October 2, 2013. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on September 25, 2013. (CLG)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER (Written Opinion) - The amended complaint of relators Andrew Ellis and Harriet Ellis 127 is STRICKEN. The amended complaint of relator Michael W. Blodgett 129 is STRICKEN. Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file an answe r or otherwise respond to the amended complaints 132 is DENIED AS MOOT. This action will be dismissed with prejudice unless relators file either an amended complaint or a motion to sever no later than February 28, 2013. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 02/15/13. (bjs) Modified on 2/15/2013 (kt).
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER - The motion of defendant City of St. Paul to dismiss the complaint 39 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion of defendant City of Minneapolis to dismiss the complaint 41 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion of defendant Metropolitan Council to dismiss the complaint 47 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motions of relator Michael W. Blodgett to amend the complaint 34 , 53 , and 57 are DENIED. The motion of relator Michael W. Blodgett for a continuance 55 is DENIED AS MOOT . The motion of relators Andrew and Harriet Ellis for a hearing regarding discovery issues 73 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This action will be dismissed with prejudice on account of relators' failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 unless r elators file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Rules of the District of Minnesota, and this order no later than January 31, 2013. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 12/21/12.(bjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
