OPS America, Inc. v. Safariland, LLC 911 EP, Inc. et al
| OPS America, Inc. |
| Safariland, LLC 911 EP, Inc. and Emergency Technology, Inc. |
| OPS America, Inc. |
| Emergency Technology, Inc. |
| 0:2011cv00567 |
| March 4, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Tony N. Leung |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Safarilands Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 42] is GRANTED.2.SoundOffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 31] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.3.Summary judgment is GRANTED in favor of SoundOff on OPSs claims against SoundOff. Summary judgment is DENIED on SoundOffs counterclaims against OPS.4.OPSs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 52] is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 21, 2012. (slf)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Defendants motion to strike [Docket No. 59] is DENIED.2.OPS Americas motion to amend the pretrial scheduling order [Docket No. 62] is DENIED.3.The Court will hear OPS Americas motion for summary judgment, as well as Defendants motions for summary judgment, on March 15. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 21, 2012. (slf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
