Zochert v. RBC Capital Markets Corp.
Plaintiff: Sharon E. Zochert
Defendant: RBC Capital Markets Corp.
Case Number: 0:2011cv00603
Filed: March 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Presiding Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 621
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 6 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). It is hereby ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. Let Judgment Be Entered. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/19/11. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zochert v. RBC Capital Markets Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon E. Zochert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RBC Capital Markets Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?