Semler et al v. Ludeman et al
| Raymond L. Semler and Paul J. Knutson |
| Jessica Giles, Jean Seykora, Steven Lindeen, Cal Ludeman, Dennis Benson, Daniel Storkamp, Erick Skon, Mehrada Shabestari, Raymond Ruotsalainen, Kevin Moser and Gregg Carlson |
| 0:2011cv00644 |
| March 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Carlton |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Jeffrey J. Keyes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
AMENDED ORDER STAYING CASE. 1.Stay of All Cases Pending Resolution of Pending Motion for ClassCertification in Civil No. 11-3659 (DWF/JJK). All current and future civil rights cases brought by an individual or group of individuals w ho has or have been civilly committed to the Minnesota Sex Offender Program are hereby STAYED in all respects, with the exception of Civil No. 11-3659(DWF/JJK) and Civil No. 11-1704 (DWF/JJK), pending resolution of the motion for class certification in Civil No. 11-3659 (DWF/JJK), unless otherwise ordered by the Court. 2.Service. The Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota is respectfully directed to provide a copy of this Order, via United States mail, to every unrepresented Plaintiff in all of the cases that are stayed.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 2/6/12. (GRR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
