Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. GSI Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Defendant: GSI Technology, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2011cv00789
Filed: March 30, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Both
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation v. GSI Technology, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation
Represented By: David A Gerasimow
Represented By: Michael E Florey
Represented By: Thomas - NA L Halkowski
Represented By: Frank - NA E Scherkenbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GSI Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Sonya R Braunschweig
Represented By: Mark D Fowler
Represented By: Saori Kaji
Represented By: Alan L Kildow
Represented By: Timothy W Lohse
Represented By: Michael G Schwartz
Represented By: Gerald T Sekimura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?