Picht v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Heidi Picht
Defendant: James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2011cv00958
Filed: April 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Stevens
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 139 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant's Combined Motion for Summary Judgment and to Dismiss under Rule 9(b) (Picht) 25 is GRANTED and Plaintiff Picht's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/2/18. (GRR)
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendant James Hardie Building Products Inc.'s Notice of Supplemental Authority 289 is DENIED. 2. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in S upport of Brief in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 299 is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in Support of Motion for Class Certification 301 is GRANTED. 4. Plaintiffs& #039; Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in Support of Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification 424 is GRANTED. 5. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification 432 is GRANTED. 6. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority 442 is GRANTED. 7. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority 447 is GRANTED. 8. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority 453 is GRANTED. 9. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority 459 is GRANTED. 10. Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in Support of Motion for Class Certification 464 is GRANTED. 11. Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Improperly Filed Material or, in the Alternative for Leave to File a Reply Brief 476 is DENIED. 12. Defendant's Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority 479 is GRANTED. (Written Opinion)l Signed by Judge Michael J. Davis on 12/20/17. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD-LIB et al.(GRR)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER in case 0:11-cv-00958-MJD; granting 165 Motion to Compel in case 0:12-md-02359-MJD. Signed by Special Master Jonathan G. Lebedoff on 8/20/15. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD et al.(GRR)
August 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER AMENDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 5. Signed by Special Master Jonathan Lebedoff on 8/18/15. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD et al.(GRR)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant James Hardie Building Products Inc.'s Amended Objection to Special Master Case Management Order No. 3 96 is OVERRULED and Special Master Case Management Order No. 3 84 is AFFIRMED. 2. Defen dant James Hardie Building Products Inc.'s Amended Objection to Special Master Case Management Order No. 4 97 is OVERRULED and Special Master Case Management Order No. 4 85 is AFFIRMED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 1/28/14. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD et al.(GRR)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 119 SPECIAL MASTER CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 2 - SCHEDULING. (Written Opinion). Signed by Jonathan Lebedoff, Special Master on 9/16/13. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD et al.(GRR)
July 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 118 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:1.Defendant James Hardie Building Products Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss 36 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a.Claims of Brian Bethel (Ohio)1.Bethel Count 1: Express Warranty REMAINS .2.Bethel Count 2: Implied Warranty is DISMISSED. 3.Bethel Count 10: Ohio Product Liability Act is DISMISSED.4.Bethel Count 11: Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act is DISMISSED with regard to the class allegations and REMAINS with regard to Bethels ind ividual allegations. 5.Bethel Count 12: Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act is DISMISSED. b.Claims of Jonathan Bowers (Minnesota)1.Bowers Count 1: Express Warranty REMAINS. 2.Bowers Count 2: Implied Warranty REMAINS. 3.Bowers Count 3: Negligence is DI SMISSED. 4.Bowers Counts 7 & 8: Minnesota Acts REMAIN. c.Claims of Mark Kostos, Richard Treece, and John Brown (Illinois)1.Kostos, Treece & Brown Count 1: Express Warranty REMAINS as to Brown and is DISMISSED as to Kostos and Treece. 2.Kostos, Treece & Brown Count 2: Implied Warranty is DISMISSED. 3.Kostos, Treece & Brown Count 3: Negligence is DISMISSED. 4.Kostos, Treece & Brown Count 9: Illinois Consumer Fraud Act is DISMISSED. d.Claims of Hugh Fenwick (Nevada)1.Fenwick Count 1: Express Warra nty REMAINS. 2.Fenwick Count 2: Implied Warranty REMAINS. 3.Fenwick Count 3: Negligence is DISMISSED. e.Claims of Michael Swiencki (Georgia)1.Swiencki Count 1: Express Warranty REMAINS. 2.Swiencki Count 2: Implied Warranty is DISMISSED. 3.Swiencki Co unt 3: Negligence is DISMISSED. f.Claims of the Susan S. Buchanan Personal Residence Trust (Florida)1.Buchanan Trust Count 1: Express Warranty REMAINS. 2.Buchanan Trust Count 2: Implied Warranty is DISMISSED.3.Buchanan Trust Count 3: Negligence is DI SMISSED. g.Claims of James Dillingham (California)1.Dillingham Count 1: Express Warranty REMAINS. 2.Dillingham Count 2: Implied Warranty is DISMISSED. 3.Dillingham Count 3: Negligence is DISMISSED. h.Claims of Masoud Kavianpour (Virginia)1.Kavianpour Count 1: Express Warranty REMAINS. 2.Kavianpour Count 2: Implied Warranty is DISMISSED. 3.Kavianpour Count 3: Negligence is DISMISSED. 4.Kavianpour Count 15: Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act is DISMISSED. 5.Kavianpour Counts 13 and 1 4: the Virginia Consumer Protection Act REMAIN. i.Claims by All Plaintiffs1.Count 4: Declaratory and Injunctive Relief REMAINS. 2.Count 5: California Unfair Competition Law REMAINS. 3.Count 6: California Consumers Legal Remedies Act is DISMISSED.2.De fendant's Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss 49 is GRANTED. 3.Defendant's Second Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss 55 is GRANTED. 4.Pla intiffs Heidi Picht and Jonathan Bowers' Motion for Leave to Cite Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 57 is GRANTED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/15/13. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD et al.(GRR)
March 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 116 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Within seven days from the date of this Order, Plaintiffs shall submit a one page document explicitly stating whether or not they concede that Counts 2 and 3 are subject to dismissal and, if so, whether they concede dismissal as to all or only particular Plaintiffs.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/21/13. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD et al.(GRR)
October 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 112 PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 4: Amending Pretrial Order No. 2 to grant additional powers to Special Master Jonathan Lebedoff. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 10/3/12. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD-LIB et al.(GRR)
September 28, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 108 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 .(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 9/28/12. Associated Cases: 0:12-md-02359-MJD-LIB et al.(GRR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Picht v. James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heidi Picht
Represented By: Clayton D Halunen
Represented By: Charles J LaDuca
Represented By: Eric N Linsk
Represented By: Michael-NA A. McShane
Represented By: Elizabeth R Odette
Represented By: Charles E Schaffer
Represented By: Robert K Shelquist
Represented By: Shawn J Wanta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Hardie Building Products, Inc.
Represented By: U Zoya Arora
Represented By: Heidi A O Fisher
Represented By: Aron J Frakes
Represented By: Steven P Handler
Represented By: David C Klink
Represented By: Christopher M Murphy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?