Mudrich v. WalMart Stores

Mudrich v. WalMart Stores

Plaintiff:	Bryan R. Mudrich
Defendant:	WalMart Stores
Case Number:	0:2011cv01229
Filed:	May 11, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Dakota
Presiding Judge:	Jeffrey J. Keyes
Presiding Judge:	John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 8, 2013	Filing 116 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) Granting in part and denying in part defendant's 90 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted with respect to the plaintiff's whistleblow er claim. The motion is denied with respect to the plaintiff's wrongful termination/gender discrimination claims and his defamation claim. (2) Adopt Magistrate Judge's 111 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 8, 2013. (DML)
December 9, 2011	Filing 53 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 . Defendant Wal-Mart's Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's age discrimination claims only. Plaintiff's age d iscrimination claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is WITHDRAWN with respect to Plaintiff's sex discrimination claims, and therefore Plaintiff's sex discrimination claims remain. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintif f's wrongful termination claim to the extent that it is based on sex discrimination, but GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's wrongful termination claim to the extent that it is based on age discrimination. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 9, 2011. (HAM)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 8, 2013

Filing 116 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) Granting in part and denying in part defendant's 90 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted with respect to the plaintiff's whistleblow er claim. The motion is denied with respect to the plaintiff's wrongful termination/gender discrimination claims and his defamation claim. (2) Adopt Magistrate Judge's 111 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on July 8, 2013. (DML)

December 9, 2011

Filing 53 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 . Defendant Wal-Mart's Motion to Dismiss 3 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's age discrimination claims only. Plaintiff's age d iscrimination claims are dismissed with prejudice. The motion is WITHDRAWN with respect to Plaintiff's sex discrimination claims, and therefore Plaintiff's sex discrimination claims remain. The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintif f's wrongful termination claim to the extent that it is based on sex discrimination, but GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's wrongful termination claim to the extent that it is based on age discrimination. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 9, 2011. (HAM)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mudrich v. WalMart Stores
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan R. Mudrich
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: WalMart Stores
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?