Hurd v. Roy
Plaintiff: Russell John Hurd
Defendant: Tom Roy
Case Number: 0:2011cv01259
Filed: May 13, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Tony N. Leung
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER (1) ADOPTING Magistrate Judge's 8 Report and Recommendation. (2) DENYING petitioner's 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in District Court filed by Russell John Hurd. (3) DENYING petitioner's 1 Petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus. (4) DENYING as moot petitioner's 17 Motion for a Protective Order (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 14, 2011. (DML)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hurd v. Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Roy
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Russell John Hurd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?