Acosta v. Acosta
Plaintiff: Ricardo Acosta
Defendant: Anne Marie Acosta
Case Number: 0:2011cv01524
Filed: June 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: XX Outside US
Presiding Judge: Steven E Rau
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 3 Plaintiff's Motion for TRO; this action is stayed until September 10, 2011. Plaintiff shall renew his Petition on or before October 1, 2011 or this action will be dismissed (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 08/23/2011. (TLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acosta v. Acosta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricardo Acosta
Represented By: Nancy Zalusky Berg
Represented By: Allison Maxim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anne Marie Acosta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?