Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:	Product Fabricators, Inc.
Case Number:	0:2011cv02071
Filed:	July 27, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Pine
Presiding Judge:	Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 18, 2013	Filing 143 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:1. Plaintiff EEOC's Motion for Summary Judgment on Successor Liability 86 is DENIED AS MOOT. 2. Plaintiff-Intervenor Adam Breauxs Motion for Summary Judgment on Successor Liability 91 is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. Defendants Product Fabricators, Inc. and M&M Manufacturing, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 93 is GRANTED as follows: a. The EEOC's Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety; b. The following count in Adam Breaux's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Count One, Disability Discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act; and c. The following counts in Adam Breaux's Complaint are D ISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: Count Two, Retaliatory Discharge (Minnesota Statute 176.82, subdivision 1); and Count Three, Refusal to Offer Continued Employment (Minnesota Statute 176.82, subdivision 2). 4. Defendants Objection to the Magistrate's November 7, 2012 Order 138 is DENIED AS MOOT.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/18/13. (GRR)
July 10, 2012	Filing 65 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 63 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). That Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 13 is GRANTED as more fully described in Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois's Report and Recommendation, dated June 18, 2012. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/10/12. (KMW)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 18, 2013

Filing 143 MEMORANDUM OF LAW & ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:1. Plaintiff EEOC's Motion for Summary Judgment on Successor Liability 86 is DENIED AS MOOT. 2. Plaintiff-Intervenor Adam Breauxs Motion for Summary Judgment on Successor Liability 91 is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. Defendants Product Fabricators, Inc. and M&M Manufacturing, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 93 is GRANTED as follows: a. The EEOC's Complaint against Defendants is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety; b. The following count in Adam Breaux's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE: Count One, Disability Discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act; and c. The following counts in Adam Breaux's Complaint are D ISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION: Count Two, Retaliatory Discharge (Minnesota Statute 176.82, subdivision 1); and Count Three, Refusal to Offer Continued Employment (Minnesota Statute 176.82, subdivision 2). 4. Defendants Objection to the Magistrate's November 7, 2012 Order 138 is DENIED AS MOOT.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 3/18/13. (GRR)

July 10, 2012

Filing 65 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 63 Report and Recommendation (Written Opinion). That Plaintiff's Motion to Strike 13 is GRANTED as more fully described in Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois's Report and Recommendation, dated June 18, 2012. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/10/12. (KMW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Product Fabricators, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Product Fabricators, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By:	John-NA C Hendrickson
Represented By:	Jean P Kamp
Represented By:	Nicholas J Pladson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?