Triemert et al v. Washington County et al
Plaintiff: David B. Triemert and Hospitality Contractors of Minnesota, LLC
Defendant: James Schug, William Hutton and Washington County
Case Number: 0:2011cv02351
Filed: August 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER denying 43 Motion. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 12/14/11. (kll) (cc: Hospitality Contractors of Minnesota, LLC, David B. Triemert) Modified on 12/14/2011 (akl).
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss/General, dismissing the Complaint 1 Without Prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 11/14/11. (kll) CC: Trimert, Hospitality Contractors. (KT)
September 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER denying 22 Letter Request to District Judge filed by David B. Triemert. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 09/29/11. (kll)
September 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER REFERRING 12 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel to Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel for appropriate disposition and CANCELING the October 27 hearing before Judge Kyle on said Motion; Within 20 days of the date of this Order, an attorney licensed t o practice before this Court SHALL file a Notice of Appearance on behalf of Plaintiff Hospitality Contractors; Continuing sine die the October 27 hearing on 7 Motion, however briefing shall continue on this Motion as if the hearing remained scheduled for October 27, 2011. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 09/22/11. (kll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Triemert et al v. Washington County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Schug
Represented By: Nigel H Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Hutton
Represented By: Nigel H Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington County
Represented By: Nigel H Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David B. Triemert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hospitality Contractors of Minnesota, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?