Thull v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Adam Thull
Defendant: Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd., Techtronic Industries North America, Inc., One World Technologies Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Case Number: 0:2011cv02368
Filed: August 17, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Crow Wing
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Magnuson
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 256 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 251 granting 247 Motion for Review of Taxation of Costs. Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court ADOPTS the February 4, 2015, Report and Recommendation 251 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Thull's motion for review of the clerk's entry of cost judgment 247 is GRANTED. 2. The cost judgment 246 is VACATED. 3. No costs will be taxed. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on March 9, 2015. (CLG)
April 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 108 ORDER denying 94 Motion (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 04/15/14. (BJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thull v. Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Thull
Represented By: George F Carpinello
Represented By: Angus W Dwyer
Represented By: Gale D Pearson
Represented By: Stuart-NA H Singer
Represented By: Richard J Sullivan
Represented By: David-NA M Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Techtronic Industries Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Techtronic Industries North America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One World Technologies Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryobi Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?