Dixon v. Clearwire Corporation
Plaintiff: Joseph Dixon
Defendant: Clearwire Corporation
Case Number: 0:2011cv02558
Filed: September 6, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Presiding Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER denying 138 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 24, 2014. (CBC)
February 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendation 126 : The Court's Order of July 31, 2012 52 is VACATED insofar as it denied Defendant's Motion to Dismiss in part. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 4 is GRANTED in full. Defendant&# 039;s Motion for Summary Judgment 92 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Against Defendant Clearwire Corporation [etc.] 110 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion to the Court for Relief and Judgment to be Granted Plaintiff [etc.] 117 is DENIED. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 129 is DENIED AS MOOT. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 6, 2014. (CBC) CC: Dixon. (kt)
July 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER : IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1.Defendants Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 4] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:a.Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with regard to Plaintiffs RICO claim. Plaintiffs RICO claim is dismissed WITH PREJ UDICE.b.Defendants Motion to Dismiss is DENIED with regard to Plaintiffs breach of contract claim.2.Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 12] is DENIED without prejudice.3.Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions Against Defendant and its Counsel Kerry Middleton and Rhiannon Beckendorf on Grounds of Perjury [Docket No. 14] is DENIED.4.Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment [Docket No. 18] is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on July 31, 2012. (slf)cc: Joseph Dixon Modified on 7/31/2012 (jam).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dixon v. Clearwire Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Dixon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clearwire Corporation
Represented By: Rhiannon C Beckendorf
Represented By: Kerry L Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?