Nelson v. Stuart et al
| Norlyn Stanley Nelson |
| James Stuart and Loe |
| 0:2011cv03143 |
| October 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Anoka |
| David S. Doty |
| Tony N. Leung |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
ORDER VACATING 114 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations; Granting 80 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Anoka County Jail and James Stuart; Adopting 113 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; Granting 93 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by John Loes; Overruling 116 Objection to Report and Recommendations filed by Norlyn Stanley Nelson.(Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 9/24/2014. (PJM)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Granting 80 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by The Anoka County Jail, James Stuart; Adopting 113 Report and Recommendation; Granting 93 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by John Loes (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 3/5/2014. (PJM) (cc: Norlyn Stanley Nelson) Modified on 3/5/2014 (jz).
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Granting in part 13 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by The Anoka County Jail, James Stuart; Adopting 31 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 11/20/2012. (PJM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
